Difference between Ultra Vires and Petitioner

ULTRA VIRES vs PETITIONER: NOUN

Beyond power; transcending authority; -- a phrase used frequently in relation to acts or enactments by corporations in excess of their chartered or statutory rights.
Beyond one's power; specifically, beyond the legal or constitutional power of a person, court, or corporation.

Null, Contravened, Justiciable, Mala fide, Nullity, Lawful, Prohibitory, Unlawful, Unenforceable, Inapplicable, Statutory, Unconstitutional, Contravention, Violative, Intra vires

Applicants, Perpetrator, Proposer, Complaint, Objector, Requester, Settlor, Applicant, Appellee, Plaintiff, Claimant, Complainant, Appellant, Supplicant, Suppliant

Null, Contravened, Justiciable, Mala fide, Nullity, Lawful, Prohibitory, Unlawful, Unenforceable, Inapplicable, Statutory, Unconstitutional, Contravention, Violative, Intra vires

Motion, Offender, Inquirer, Herein, Perpetrator, Complaint, Settlor, Applicant, Appellee, Plaintiff, Claimant, Complainant, Appellant, Supplicant, Suppliant

Remedios para evitar la responsabilidad ultra vires hereditatis.
Circular being declared ultra vires, void and invalid.
This became known as the ultra vires doctrine.
Ultra vires unavailable to invalidate transfers of property.
It is simply because we are ultra vires.
And this was ultra vires the federal government.
Ultra vires contract: A contract of a corporation which is ultra vires is void ab initio and of no legal effect.
How can it be ultra vires if it has no vires to be ultra?
All, including adjudicators, QCAT, BCC solicitors and counsel, real estate agent and employee heaped ultra vires incompetence upon ultra vires incompetence.
Companies Act, Memorandurn Association, and Ultra vires the Articles act done contrary to in scope of ultra vires Act.

The petitioner Unified Judicial System provides forms for citizens, the petitioner various forms and filled.
Petitioner has no other legal names or aliases by which Petitioner is or has beenknown.
Petitioner requests that the Court order Respondent to pay the following temporary alimony to Petitioner.
Petitioner appealed and the Appellate Division reversed, stating that the trial court had placed too heavy a burden upon petitioner.
Petitioner then presented these documents to a Magistrate, along with a warrant form that petitioner also had completed.
De Guzman cleared petitioner of any psychological disorder, saying that petitioner has the capacity to understand and comply with her marital obligations.
The petitioner can recommend that the petitioner be appointed to serve as Conservator.
If petitioner is incarcerated out of state, petitioner shall be allowed to offer testimony by affidavit or deposition.
And since counsel would have failed had he acted as petitioner demands, petitioner cannot show prejudice.
Petitioner and Respondent, which found that Petitioner is the father of minor child.