Difference between True Statement and Epichirema

TRUE STATEMENT vs EPICHIREMA: NOUN

A syllogism in which the proof of the major or minor premise, or both, is introduced with the premises themselves, and the conclusion is derived in the ordinary manner.
As commonly used, a syllogism having the truth of one or both of its premises confirmed by a proposition annexed (called a prosyllogism), so that an abridged compound argument is formed: as, All sin is dangerous; covetousness is sin (for it is a transgression of the law); therefore, covetousness is dangerous. “For it is a transgression of the law” is a prosyllogism, confirming the proposition that “covetousness is sin.”
As used by Aristotle, a reasoning based on premises generally admitted but open to doubt.
In logic:

Misken, Petitio principii, Antefact, Falsism, Untruism, In truth, In esse, Notandum, Constative, Pseudodox, Apagoge, Substantialism, Malicho, Fact, Truth

Misken, Petitio principii, Antefact, Falsism, Untruism, In truth, In esse, Notandum, Constative, Pseudodox, Apagoge, Substantialism, Malicho, Fact, Truth

In reality this is not a true statement.
Just provide a true statement to the while.
In my experience, this is a true statement.
PSE for each group generates a true statement.
In Pascal, a true statement returns a one and a false statement returns a zero.
Suppose p is a true statement and q is a false statement.
Drive or shape of lengths for it in algebra find unknown digit to make true statement true or dividing two starting with the solving.
If the statement is false rewrite the RIGHT side of the equation to make a true statement.
The following statement is a true statement, which is proven in many calculus texts.
The following is a true statement Write a true biconditional statement.