Difference between Italic Language and Dead Language

ITALIC LANGUAGE vs DEAD LANGUAGE: NOUN

A branch of the Indo-European languages of which Latin is the chief representative

A language which no longer has any native speakers
A language, such as Latin, that is no longer learned as a native language by a speech community.
A language that is no longer learned as a native language

Old latin, Hellenic language, Baltic language, Medieval latin, Italicism, Old italian, Low latin, Late latin, Landsmal, Old church slavonic, Vulgar latin, Dead language, Classical latin, Faliscan, Italic

Semitist, Modern hebrew, Landsmal, Classical latin, Faliscan, Hellenic language, Italic language, Pehlevi, Tsade, Old church slavonic, Middle persian, Elamitic, Anatolian language, Old persian, Palaic

Old latin, Hellenic language, Baltic language, Medieval latin, Italicism, Old italian, Low latin, Late latin, Landsmal, Old church slavonic, Vulgar latin, Dead language, Classical latin, Faliscan, Italic

Semitist, Modern hebrew, Landsmal, Classical latin, Faliscan, Hellenic language, Italic language, Pehlevi, Tsade, Old church slavonic, Middle persian, Elamitic, Anatolian language, Old persian, Palaic

Latin is technically a dead language, but many modern languages are heavily based on Latin.
What is left is an unruly machine sputtering bizar growly dead language.
Aramaic seems to be the de facto dead language for media purposes these days.
It is not like the letter was written in a dead language.
Unfortunately so far it only translates into an incomprehensible dead language.
To be honest i think asm is a dead language.
Hebrew was considered a dead language for centuries.
Today, the Latin language, which is the dead language, is used only in the Catholic Church.
Sanskrit is a rich language, but it is now a dead language.
It is also an error to term tlio written language a dead language, and say, as Dr.